美国的发展模式会让美国人死得早

等糨糊

http://finance.sina.com.cn/zl/ch ... ykcypq3001273.shtml

Jason_Lrod1

有幸在美国生活了大半年，不能说美国什么都好，但美国的消费的确很低，人也很友好，至少在表面上比较友好，也没有感觉到不安全。所以总感觉国内的很多文章都比较片面，好像总在反驳美国好一样。真心希望写文章的人能客观一些，不要误导没机会出国的善良人们。

指尖记忆

贪腐狗官当然得跑了，难道我国的是犯罪的天堂吗？说往美国跑就是美国好的人真白痴。

liuxq

哈哈哈！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！

不高兴也笑

我也哈哈:-)！！！好不好用事实说话，高官巨贾的老婆孩子都它妈跑美国，！！！

采菊东篱66

近日（2016年）美国《医学快报》报道，根据世界卫生组织的统计，在过去的15年里，世界范围内的预期寿命增长了约5年，2015年全球人口的平均寿命为71.4岁，影响寿命的因素包括地区疾病、心理卫生、药物滥用、暴力、饮用水、道路交通伤害、性健康、生殖健康、环境污染和疫苗注射等。

人在江湖飞

为什么贪腐狗官们让家人情人去那儿啊

南宁葛树禄

不敢评论这个问题，因为各有所爱吧。你觉得不好的，别人觉得好，呵呵呵呵

大松树

太民主会耗劳动力会不民主

指尖记忆

贪腐狗官当然得跑了，难道我国的是犯罪的天堂吗？说往美国跑就是美国好的人真白痴。

steed

谢谢分享                          

怪兽必须死

指尖记忆 发表于 2017-8-23 08:50
贪腐狗官当然得跑了，难道我国的是犯罪的天堂吗？说往美国跑就是美国好的人真白痴。

你这种说法就更白痴了，瘫官在国内有牢狱之灾，往外跑可以理解，但是现在很多高层子女都被送米国去了，这可是瘫官们的希望，他们会把亲生骨肉往火坑里推么？！所以说不看瘫官的去向，要看瘫官子女的去向！

他是老自

得亏作者是个英国佬，如果是华人，估计得被喷死 。。{:2_349:}

想念依然

美国人自己一直在说这个问题。
/ M4 M3 }6 ~  _想真正了解，把下面的文章读一遍。
) ?3 y! i8 f" b/ \$ q
A new book by economist Peter Temin finds that the U.S. is no longer one country, but dividing into two separate economic and political worlds

ou’ve probably heard the news that the celebrated post-WW II beating heart of America known as the middle class has gone from “burdened,” to “squeezed” to “dying.”  But you might have heard less about what exactly is emerging in its place.

! s; b2 Q+ i7 ?% p! tIn a new book, The Vanishing Middle Class: Prejudice and Power in a Dual Economy, Peter Temin, Professor Emeritus of Economics at MIT, draws a portrait of the new reality in a way that is frighteningly, indelibly clear:  America is not one country anymore. It is becoming two, each with vastly different resources, expectations, and fates.
- ]* I' e; S, G# t
Two roads diverged

6 h$ z# v: x2 G: t/ T0 I$ W- z# j& XIn one of these countries live members of what Temin calls the “FTE sector” (named for finance, technology, and electronics, the industries which largely support its growth). These are the 20 percent of Americans who enjoy college educations, have good jobs, and sleep soundly knowing that they have not only enough money to meet life’s challenges, but also social networks to bolster their success. They grow up with parents who read books to them, tutors to help with homework, and plenty of stimulating things to do and places to go. They travel in planes and drive new cars. The citizens of this country see economic growth all around them and exciting possibilities for the future. They make plans, influence policies, and count themselves as lucky to be Americans.
, \% E4 p: D* r$ A6 w5 d. s
: g  W# T+ \9 a3 I2 ]% @4 B' hThe FTE citizens rarely visit the country where the other 80 percent of Americans live: the low-wage sector. Here, the world of possibility is shrinking, often dramatically. People are burdened with debt and anxious about their insecure jobs if they have a job at all. Many of them are getting sicker and dying younger than they used to. They get around by crumbling public transport and cars they have trouble paying for. Family life is uncertain here; people often don’t partner for the long-term even when they have children. If they go to college, they finance it by going heavily into debt. They are not thinking about the future; they are focused on surviving the present. The world in which they reside is very different from the one they were taught to believe in. While members of the first country act, these people are acted upon.

The two sectors, notes Temin, have entirely distinct financial systems, residential situations, and educational opportunities. Quite different things happen when they get sick, or when they interact with the law. They move independently of each other. Only one path exists by which the citizens of the low-wage country can enter the affluent one, and that path is fraught with obstacles. Most have no way out.
2 C3 o7 a! L5 d
The richest large economy in the world, says Temin, is coming to have an economic and political structure more like a developing nation. We have entered a phase of regression, and one of the easiest ways to see it is in our infrastructure: our roads and bridges look more like those in Thailand or Venezuela than the Netherlands or Japan. But it goes far deeper than that, which is why Temin uses a famous economic model created to understand developing nations to describe how far inequality has progressed in the United States. The model is the work of West Indian economist W. Arthur Lewis, the only person of African descent to win a Nobel Prize in economics. For the first time, this model is applied with systematic precision to the U.S.
1 G* s7 ^0 Y& P1 [8 f- s3 M+ k
" M5 F3 |% Q3 D4 U. {) N; H# vThe result is profoundly disturbing.
4 X$ A! u2 u. g; x
+ C# I0 d9 Y% k7 e$ Y- FIn the Lewis model of a dual economy, much of the low-wage sector has little influence over public policy. Check. The high-income sector will keep wages down in the other sector to provide cheap labor for its businesses. Check. Social control is used to keep the low-wage sector from challenging the policies favored by the high-income sector. Mass incarceration - check. The primary goal of the richest members of the high-income sector is to lower taxes. Check. Social and economic mobility is low. Check.

0 N5 R( n1 w- E: n* {. [In the developing countries Lewis studied, people try to move from the low-wage sector to the affluent sector by transplanting from rural areas to the city to get a job. Occasionally it works; often it doesn’t. Temin says that today in the U.S., the ticket out is education, which is difficult for two reasons: you have to spend money over a long period of time, and the FTE sector is making those expenditures more and more costly by defunding public schools and making policies that increase student debt burdens.   

Getting a good education, Temin observes, isn’t just about a college degree. It has to begin in early childhood, and you need parents who can afford to spend time and resources all along the long journey. If you aspire to college and your family can’t make transfers of money to you on the way, well, good luck to you. Even with a diploma, you will likely find that high-paying jobs come from networks of peers and relatives. Social capital, as well as economic capital, is critical, but because of America’s long history of racism and the obstacles it has created for accumulating both kinds of capital, black graduates often can only find jobs in education, social work, and government instead of higher-paying professional jobs like technology or finance— something most white people are not really aware of. Women are also held back by a long history of sexism and the burdens — made increasingly heavy — of making greater contributions to the unpaid care economy and lack of access to crucial healthcare.

老旁听生

“发展模式” 和 “预期寿命” 是两个很有意思的词汇，前者是笼统、模糊的，后者是针对国民整体的。所以，没法用特定人群的行为来判断这篇文章的对错。
. }5 }9 q) a' x+ d
浏览一遍，感觉给出的数据和分析结论是自洽的，没法认定其论证存在重大漏洞。
! y* o0 e' j! u
! Q( O1 [) g. P0 Y移民现象，从中国去的不属于难民和偷渡，一定会有财产保证，换言之属于国内的富（贵）人圈，去了美国也是追求或者成为事实的高收入阶层，自身感觉会很好。“预期寿命” 这个术语是有 “国民平均” 的前缀限制词，只要说平均，差异就会被抹平哈～^_^

大松树

标准非常说明极端主义的倾向，，，，，，，，，，，，，，，，

sdhsjwtt

简单                                             

010051

指尖记忆 发表于 2017-8-22 12:50
4 \0 |" q# \8 r" ~- Y7 y贪腐狗官当然得跑了，难道我国的是犯罪的天堂吗？说往美国跑就是美国好的人真白痴。

- d& [+ G: w! _" j& ^/ i0 B解放战争时期，gchd的干部是把老婆孩子留在解放区延安，而自己却在敌占区为D工作；但自从某设计师开始，gchd的高官争先恐后地把老婆孩子送到米国，把其当作解放区，而自己却留在国内继续为D工作。时髦的称呼是“裸官”！真是风水轮流转啊！一声叹息！！

我爱军转2

解放战争时期，gchd的干部是把老婆孩子留在解放区延安，而自己却在敌占区为D工作；但自从某设计师开始，gchd的高官争先恐后地把老婆孩子送到米国，把其当作解放区，而自己却留在国内继续为D工作。时髦的称呼是“裸官”！真是风水轮流转啊！一声叹息！！